Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÇelikoğlu, Mevlüt
dc.contributor.authorOktay, Hüsamettin
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:52:38Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:52:38Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationÇelikoğlu, M. ve Oktay, H. (2014). Effects of maxillary protraction for early correction of class III malocclusion. European Journal of Orthodontics, 36(1), 86-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt006en_US
dc.identifier.issn0141-5387
dc.identifier.issn1460-2210
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2436
dc.descriptionWOS: 000330836700012en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 23460730en_US
dc.description.abstractThis prospective study investigated the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue effects of a mini maxillary protractor appliance in class III subjects with maxillary retrusion and mandibular protrusion and compared these changes with those of untreated, well matched control sample with normal occlusions. Twenty patients with class III malocclusion (mean age 11.10.8 years) and 20 subjects with normal occlusion (mean age 10.90.4 years) were included to this study. The class III subjects were treated with the mini maxillary protractor appliance, and the others were used as control subjects. Paired t-test and Students t-test were used to determine the within- and between-group differences, respectively. In the study group, the maxilla moved forward (SNA, 2.0 degrees and AY, 2.4mm) (P < 0.001) with a slight rotation of palatal and occlusal planes (SNPP, 0.8 degree and SNOP, 0.7 degree) (P > 0.05). The mandible displaced backwards and downwards (SNB, 1.1 degrees; SND, 0.9 degree; BY, 0.9mm and PogY, 0.3mm; P < 0.001). These movements in the maxilla and mandible caused a significant improvement in intermaxillary sagittal relationship (ANB, 3.0 degrees; Convexity, 6.3 degrees; Wits, 4.6mm; P < 0.001). The maxillary incisors moved forward (2.2 degrees) while the mandibular ones backward (1.9 degrees). The improvement in overjet was 5.0mm, and 66.1 per cent of this change (3.3mm) was skeletal (AY; 2.4mm and BY; 0.9mm), and the remaining (1.7mm) dentoalveolar (U1NA; 0.9mm and L1-NB; 0.8mm). The change in LsE measurement was more in the study group (2.1mm), and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMalocclusionen_US
dc.subjectMaxillary Protractionen_US
dc.subjectDentalen_US
dc.titleEffects of maxillary protraction for early correction of class III malocclusionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-7862-2983en_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage86en_US
dc.identifier.endpage92en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejo/cjt006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster