Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDaşkaya, Hayrettin
dc.contributor.authorYazıcı, Haşmet
dc.contributor.authorDoğan, Sedat
dc.contributor.authorHaberal Can, İlknur
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:52:19Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:52:19Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationDaşkaya, H., Yazıcı, H., Doğan, S. ve Haberal Can, İ. (2014). Septoplasty: Under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious? European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 271(9), 2433-2436. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2865-6en_US
dc.identifier.issn0937-4477
dc.identifier.issn1434-4726
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2865-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2380
dc.descriptionWOS: 000339973800014en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 24384631en_US
dc.description.abstractThe objective of the study was to assess the more efficacious anesthesia method in septal surgery. The prospective study was conducted at an academic secondary referral center. A prospective chart review of 60 patients, between the ages of 16 and 65, who underwent septal surgery under general (GA) or sedation (SDA) anesthesia during 1-year period was done. Mean age of the patients was 44.30 +/- A 13.29. Patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia method: general (group 1) or sedation (group 2). Intraoperative hemodynamic variables, surgery time, intraoperative blood loss volume, length of hospital stay, postoperative vomiting and nausea, postoperative pain score according to the visual analog scale (VAS) and cost analysis of each method were compared. Thirty-six males and 24 females with a mean age 44.30 +/- A 13.29 were included to the study. Total operation time, operation time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding volume, postoperative nausea and vomiting, duration of hospital stay after surgery, were better in group 2. Postoperative pain scores and patient satisfaction about surgery were not statistically different. Cost of anesthesia in group 1 per patient was $44.35 +/- A 10.81 and in group 2, $16.29 +/- A 11.88 (p < 0.01). Hospital stay after surgery was much longer in group 1 than group 2 (p < 0.01). Using SDA is better in many ways including cost-effectiveness than using GA for septoplasty operation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSeptoplastyen_US
dc.subjectCost Analysisen_US
dc.subjectSedation Anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Anesthesiaen_US
dc.titleSeptoplasty: Under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngologyen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-9944-196Xen_US
dc.identifier.volume271en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2433en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2436en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00405-013-2865-6en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record