Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGüncü, Mustafa Barış
dc.contributor.authorÇakan, Umut
dc.contributor.authorAktaş, Güliz
dc.contributor.authorNigar Güncü, Güliz
dc.contributor.authorCanay, Şenay
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:51:24Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:51:24Z
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.citationGüncü, M. B., Çakan, U., Aktaş, G., Nigar Güncü, G. ve Canay, Ş. (2016). Comparison of implant versus tooth-supported zirconia-based single crowns in a split-mouth design: a 4-year clinical follow-up study. Clinical Oral Investigations, 20(9), 2467-2473. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1763-xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1763-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2209
dc.descriptionWOS: 000388957000017en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 26924133en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to evaluate the 4-year clinical performance of tooth versus implant-supported single-unit zirconia crowns (LAVA (TM)) placed on posterior region. Twenty-four patients (10 men and 14 women) who had received 48 single crowns (24 implant-supported and 24 tooth-supported) from January 2007 to December 2009, were included. California Dental Association (CDA) quality assessment system, plaque and gingival index scores were used to evaluate the performance of the crowns at baseline and at all follow-up examinations. During the follow-up period, no fracture of zirconia coping has occurred. Major complication was chipping in three patients that required a new crown fabrication. Except for the failure ones, all crowns in both groups were rated as satisfactory at the follow-up examinations based on the CDA quality assessment criteria. There were no statistically significant differences between tooth and implant-supported crowns in terms of periodontal parameters. The present 4-year follow-up clinical study demonstrates that single-unit tooth- and implant-supported zirconia crowns have similar prosthetic and periodontal outcomes. Single-unit implant or tooth-supported zirconia crowns may be considered acceptable treatment modalities for restoration of either missing or compromised posterior teeth.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectZirconiaen_US
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studyen_US
dc.subjectDental Implants Clinicalen_US
dc.subjectAll Ceramicen_US
dc.titleComparison of implant versus tooth-supported zirconia-based single crowns in a split-mouth design: A 4-year clinical follow-up studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalClinical Oral Investigationsen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2467en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2473en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-016-1763-xen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record