Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorEvcimik, Muhammed Fatih
dc.contributor.authorÖzkurt, Fazıl Emre
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Ziya
dc.contributor.authorGürsel, Ali Okan
dc.contributor.authorŞapçi, Tarık
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:51:09Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:51:09Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.citationEvcimik, M. F., Özkurt, F. E., Bozkurt, Z., Gürsel, A. O. ve Şapçi, T. (2015). Long term effects of palatal implant method in adult patients with simple snoring and obstructive sleep-apnea syndrome. Clinica Terapeutica, 166(1), 16-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.7417/CT.2015.1795en_US
dc.identifier.issn0009-9074
dc.identifier.issn1972-6007
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7417/CT.2015.1795
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2160
dc.descriptionWOS: 000354183900003en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 25756254en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective. To investigate the long term effect and reliability of palatal implant surgery, which is a minimally invasive technique, used in simple snoring and obstructive sleep-apnea syndrome types based on objective and subjective data. Materials and Methods. Seventy-eight patients were included prospectively in this study. It has been possible to obtain preoperative and postoperative polysomnography results in 59 patients. The cases were followed-up for 8 months on average. Considering the apnea index and AHI values, the patients were divided into 5 groups, namely simple snoring (n=13), mild OSAS (n=21), moderate OSAS (n=17), severe OSAS (n=8), and the group on which polysomnography could not be performed, the no-polysomnography group (n=19). The cases were evaluated based on polysomnography and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and visual analog scale filled by relatives or friends of the patients. Results. The AHI of 46 patients diagnosed with OSAS decreased from 14.9 to 10.14 (31% decline) (p=0.279). The AHI of 13 patients with simple snoring diagnosis reduced from 3.09 to 2.02 (p=0.033). A 40% improvement was observed in VAS of all cases. Implant rejection occurred in 7 of our cases and 3 patients experienced ecchymosis. Conclusion. It is concluded that palatal implant procedure is a good option for appropriate cases, it is equivalent to other methods in terms of treatment efficacy and that is more advantageous than other techniques in that it can be applied in office settings with low morbidity, is minimally invasive and brings about higher patient compliance.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSocieta Editrice Universoen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSnoringen_US
dc.subjectObstructive Sleep-Apnea Syndromeen_US
dc.subjectPalatal Implanten_US
dc.subjectOSAen_US
dc.titleLong term effects of palatal implant method in adult patients with simple snoring and obstructive sleep-apnea syndromeen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinica Terapeuticaen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-0606-864Xen_US
dc.identifier.volume166en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage16en_US
dc.identifier.endpage20en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7417/CT.2015.1795en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster