Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorUslu, Gülşah
dc.contributor.authorÖzyürek, Taha
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Koray
dc.contributor.authorGündoğar, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorPlotino, Gianluca
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:50:40Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:50:40Z
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.citationUslu, G., Özyürek, T., Yılmaz, K., Gündoğar, M. ve Plotino, G. (2018). Apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with reciproc blue, hyflex edm, and xp-endo shaper nickel-titanium files. Journal of Endodontics, 44(5), 856-859. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.018en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.018
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2045
dc.descriptionWOS: 000431942400030en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 29550013en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the amount of apically extruded debris by Reciproc Blue (REC Blue; VDW, Munich, Germany), HyFlex EDM (HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent, Altstatten, Switzerland), and XP-endo Shaper (XPS; FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) files during root canal preparation at body temperature. Methods: Sixty extracted single-rooted mandibular premolar human teeth were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n = 20). The canals were instrumented using 1 of the following instruments: REC Blue, HEDM, or XPS. Apically extruded debris during instrumentation was collected into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. All the procedures were performed at 35 degrees C. The amount of extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the weight value of the tooth-free apparatus from the postpreparation weight value. The data were analyzed using the KruskalWallis test at a 5% significance level. Results: All the instruments tested caused extrusion of some debris from the apical foramen. XPS extruded significantly less debris from the apex than REC Blue (P <.05). The difference among the HEDM group and the other groups was not significant (P> .05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the amount of apically extruded debris registered for the different files tested was REC Blue> HEDM> XPS, with a statistical difference only between XPS and REC Blue.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAgar Gel Modelen_US
dc.subjectApical Extrusionen_US
dc.subjectDebrisen_US
dc.subjectNickel-Titaniumen_US
dc.subjectInstrumentsen_US
dc.titleApically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with reciproc blue, hyflex edm, and xp-endo shaper nickel-titanium filesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-8656-7101en_US
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage856en_US
dc.identifier.endpage859en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.018en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster