Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÖzay, Rafet
dc.contributor.authorOǧur, Törel
dc.contributor.authorDurmaz, Hasan Ali
dc.contributor.authorTürkoğlu, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorÇağlar, Yusuf Şükrü
dc.contributor.authorŞekerci, Zeki
dc.contributor.authorSorar, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorHanalioğlu, Şahin
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:50:32Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:50:32Z
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.citationÖzay, R., Oǧur, T., Durmaz, H., Türkoğlu, E., Çağlar, Y., Şekerci, Z. ... Hanalioğlu, Ş. (2018). Revisiting ligament-sparing lumbar microdiscectomy: When to preserve ligamentum flavum and how to evaluate radiological results for epidural fibrosis. World Neurosurgery, 114, E378-E387. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.186en_US
dc.identifier.issn1878-8750
dc.identifier.issn1878-8769
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.186
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2012
dc.descriptionWOS: 000432959600042en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 29530695en_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Preserving the ligamentum flavum (LF) during lumbar spine surgery can help to limit the extent of postoperative epidural fibrosis (EF), which is a potential cause of persistent leg pain. We present a retrospective analysis of microdiscectomy with preservation of the LF to evaluate the effects of the two LF mobilizing techniques (reflecting inferiorly or medially vs. removing completely) on EF and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Microdiscectomy was performed through a unilateral laminotomy in 93 patients (52 male, 41 female; mean age, 46 years; range, 25-65 years) with L3-L4 (n = 3), L4-L5 (n = 40), and L5-S1 (n = 50) lumbar disc herniation. Patients whose LF was removed were assigned to group 1 (n = 42), and patients whose LF was preserved by mobilizing it medially (n = 31) or inferiorly (n = 20) were assigned to groups 2 and 3, respectively. Follow-up visual analog scale (VAS) scores and magnetic resonance images were evaluated. RESULTS: EF scores, particularly for the anterior quadrants, were significantly higher in group 1 than in groups 2 (P = 0.012) and 3 (P = 0.001). Likewise, postoperative VAS scores in group 1 were also significantly higher than in groups 2 (P = 0.009) and 3 (P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that 1) preserving the LF during lumbar microdiscectomy reduces the formation of postoperative EF and improves clinical outcomes; 2) EF in the anterior, rather than the posterior epidural space, is correlated with clinical results; and 3) the ligament mobilizing technique used should be individually tailored on the basis of the features of disc herniation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDisc Herniationen_US
dc.subjectEpidural Fibrosisen_US
dc.subjectLigamentum Flavumen_US
dc.subjectLumbar Spineen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imagingen_US
dc.subjectMicrodiscectomyen_US
dc.titleRevisiting ligament-sparing lumbar microdiscectomy: When to preserve ligamentum flavum and how to evaluate radiological results for epidural fibrosisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Neurosurgeryen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Beyin ve Sinir Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6983-8632en_US
dc.identifier.volume114en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE378en_US
dc.identifier.endpageE387en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.186en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster