Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKılınç, Delal Dara
dc.contributor.authorSayar, Gülşılay
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:50:18Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:50:18Z
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.citationKılın, D. D. ve Sayar, G. (2018). Comparison of shear bond strength of three different adhesives used as temporary bite raiser in daily orthodontic practice. International Orthodontics, 16(3), 440-449. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2018.06.011en_US
dc.identifier.issn1761-7227
dc.identifier.issn1879-680X
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2018.06.011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/1943
dc.descriptionWOS: 000442735000003en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 30006080en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of three different adhesives (Transbond XT, Light Cure Adhesive, 3M Unitek; Transbond Plus, Light Cure Band Adhesive, 3M Unitek; Transbond Supreme LV, Low Viscosity Light Cure Adhesive, 3M Unitek), which were applied to the etched enamel of occlusal faces of mandibular molar teeth to gain bite opening. The null hypothesis was that there is no statistically significant difference between shear bond strength of these three adhesives. Materials and methods: Forty-eight human molar teeth were equally divided into three groups (n = 16). Teeth were embedded in self-curing acrylic resin and were polished and etched. Adhesives were applied on the teeth and all adhesives were light cured for 20 seconds. Universal Testing Machine was used for shear bond strength tests with a crosshead blade loaded at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Evaluating the type of failure was done by using Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was used to evaluate the remaining adhesive on the tooth. Results: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the significant differences between the three different orthodontic adhesives. There was no significant difference (P = 0.774) between the groups according to ANOVA test. According to Kruskal-Wallis test there was no statistically significant differences in ARI scores among groups (P <0.01). Conclusion: The null hypothesis was accepted. There was no statistically significant difference among their bond strength values. All of three materials can be used as temporary bite openers.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Masson Sas Editeuren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBite Raiseren_US
dc.subjectOrthodontic Adhesivesen_US
dc.subjectBond Strengthen_US
dc.subjectBondingen_US
dc.subjectOrthodonticsen_US
dc.titleComparison of shear bond strength of three different adhesives used as temporary bite raiser in daily orthodontic practiceen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Orthodonticsen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-9009-6218en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-3294-2644en_US
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage440en_US
dc.identifier.endpage449en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ortho.2018.06.011en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record