• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   [email protected]
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   [email protected]
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Experimental validaton of peripheral dose distribution of electron beams for eclipse electron Monte Carlo algorithm

Thumbnail

View/Open

Tam Metin / Full Text (498.8Kb)

Access

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Date

2018

Author

Acar, Hilal
Çağlar, Mustafa
Yıldırım Altınok, Ayşe

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Acar, H., Çağlar, M. ve Yıldırım Altınok, A. (2018). Experimental validaton of peripheral dose distribution of electron beams for eclipse electron Monte Carlo algorithm. Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice, 17(3), 279-288. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1460396917000784

Abstract

Aim: The accuracy of two calculation algorithms of the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS), the electron Monte Carlo algorithm (eMC) and General Gaussian pencil beam algorithm (GGPB) for calculating peripheral dose distribution of electron beams was investigated. Methods: Peripheral dose measurements were carried out for 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 22 MeV electron beams using parallel plate ionisation chamber and EBT3 film in the slab phantom. Measurements were performed for 6 x 6, 10 x 10 and 25 x 25cm(2) cone sizes at d(max) of each energy up to 20 cm beyond the field edges. The measured and TPS calculated data were compared. Results: The TPS underestimated the out-of-field doses. The difference between measured and calculated doses increase with the cone size. For ionisation chamber measurement, the largest deviation between calculated and measured doses is <4.29% using the eMC, but can increase up to 8.72% of the distribution using GGPB. For film measurement, the minimum gamma analysis passing rates between measured and calculated dose distributions for all field sizes and energies used in this study were 91.2 and 74.7% for eMC and GGPB, respectively. Findings: The use of GGPB for planning large field treatments with 6 MeV could lead to inaccuracies of clinical significance.

xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-scopusquality

Q4

Source

Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice

Volume

17

Issue

3

URI

https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1460396917000784
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/1938

Collections

  • Makale Koleksiyonu [3205]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5339]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5545]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Guide | Contact |

[email protected]

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsInstitution AuthorORCIDTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryWoS Q ValueScopus Q ValuePublisherAccess TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsInstitution AuthorORCIDTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryWoS Q ValueScopus Q ValuePublisherAccess Type

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide || Library || İstanbul Medipol University || OAI-PMH ||

Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı, İstabul, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact: [email protected]

Creative Commons License
[email protected] by İstanbul Medipol University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

[email protected]:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.