dc.contributor.author | Avşar, Fatih Mehmet | |
dc.contributor.author | Sapmaz, Ali | |
dc.contributor.author | Uluer, Ali | |
dc.contributor.author | Erdem, Nihal Zekiye | |
dc.date.accessioned | 10.07.201910:49:13 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-10T19:50:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 10.07.201910:49:13 | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-10T19:50:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Avşar, F. M., Sapmaz, A., Uluer, A. ve Erdem, N. Z. (2018). Conversion surgery for failed adjustable gastric banding: Outcomes with sleeve gastrectomy vs roux-en-y gastric bypass. Obesity Surgery, 28(11), 3573-3579. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3397-3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0960-8923 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1708-0428 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3397-3 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/1869 | |
dc.description | WOS: 000446158200030 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed ID: 30022423 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) was once a preferred method of obesity treatment featuring a straightforward technique, removability, and good early results. In a significant proportion of patients, however, it was not a durable weight-loss procedure and has been associated with a high longer-term complication rate. The purpose of this study was to directly compare the results of conversion to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) after failed LAGB. Post-LAGB complications and weight outcomes of conversion (absolute weight, excess weight loss [%EWL], total weight loss [%TWL]) to LSG vs LRYGB were retrospectively reviewed and statistically compared using Fisher's exact test and the independent samples t test. Over a 6-year period, 74/272 (27.2%) morbidly obese LAGB patients experienced marked complications requiring band removal. Forty-nine of these patients underwent conversion by LRYGB (n = 29) or LSG (n = 20). There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between converted procedures and no significant difference in respective EWL and TWL (6-month EWL: LRYGB, 53.6% vs LSG, 51.3% and respective TWL, 22.8 vs 21.3%; 12-month EWL, 70.1 vs 56.1%; and TWL, 30.7 vs 23.2%; p > 0.05). All conversion patients were present at each time point. Outcomes for LSG vs LRYGB following failed LAGB were equally safe and effective. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass | en_US |
dc.subject | LRYGB | en_US |
dc.subject | Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy | en_US |
dc.subject | LSG | en_US |
dc.subject | Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding | en_US |
dc.subject | LAGB | en_US |
dc.subject | Conversion | en_US |
dc.subject | Redo Surgery | en_US |
dc.title | Conversion surgery for failed adjustable gastric banding: Outcomes with sleeve gastrectomy vs roux-en-y gastric bypass | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Obesity Surgery | en_US |
dc.department | İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Beslenme ve Diyetetik Bölümü | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 28 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 11 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 3573 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 3579 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11695-018-3397-3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | en_US |