Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAvşar, Fatih Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorSapmaz, Ali
dc.contributor.authorUluer, Ali
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Nihal Zekiye
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:50:04Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:50:04Z
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.citationAvşar, F. M., Sapmaz, A., Uluer, A. ve Erdem, N. Z. (2018). Conversion surgery for failed adjustable gastric banding: Outcomes with sleeve gastrectomy vs roux-en-y gastric bypass. Obesity Surgery, 28(11), 3573-3579. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3397-3en_US
dc.identifier.issn0960-8923
dc.identifier.issn1708-0428
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3397-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/1869
dc.descriptionWOS: 000446158200030en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 30022423en_US
dc.description.abstractLaparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) was once a preferred method of obesity treatment featuring a straightforward technique, removability, and good early results. In a significant proportion of patients, however, it was not a durable weight-loss procedure and has been associated with a high longer-term complication rate. The purpose of this study was to directly compare the results of conversion to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) after failed LAGB. Post-LAGB complications and weight outcomes of conversion (absolute weight, excess weight loss [%EWL], total weight loss [%TWL]) to LSG vs LRYGB were retrospectively reviewed and statistically compared using Fisher's exact test and the independent samples t test. Over a 6-year period, 74/272 (27.2%) morbidly obese LAGB patients experienced marked complications requiring band removal. Forty-nine of these patients underwent conversion by LRYGB (n = 29) or LSG (n = 20). There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between converted procedures and no significant difference in respective EWL and TWL (6-month EWL: LRYGB, 53.6% vs LSG, 51.3% and respective TWL, 22.8 vs 21.3%; 12-month EWL, 70.1 vs 56.1%; and TWL, 30.7 vs 23.2%; p > 0.05). All conversion patients were present at each time point. Outcomes for LSG vs LRYGB following failed LAGB were equally safe and effective.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypassen_US
dc.subjectLRYGBen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomyen_US
dc.subjectLSGen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Bandingen_US
dc.subjectLAGBen_US
dc.subjectConversionen_US
dc.subjectRedo Surgeryen_US
dc.titleConversion surgery for failed adjustable gastric banding: Outcomes with sleeve gastrectomy vs roux-en-y gastric bypassen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofObesity Surgeryen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Beslenme ve Diyetetik Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.startpage3573en_US
dc.identifier.endpage3579en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11695-018-3397-3en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster