Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMenek, Burak
dc.contributor.authorTarakcı, Devrim
dc.contributor.authorAlgun, Zeliha Candan
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:49:49Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:49:49Z
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.citationMenek, B., Tarakcı, D. ve Algun, Z. C. (2019). The effect of Mulligan mobilization on pain and life quality of patients with Rotator cuff syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 32(1), 171-178. https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BMR-181230en_US
dc.identifier.issn1053-8127
dc.identifier.issn1878-6324
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BMR-181230
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/1778
dc.descriptionWOS: 000460934600023en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 30248039en_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Mulligan mobilization techniques cause pain and affect the function in patients with Rotator cuff syndrome. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of Mulligan mobilization on pain and quality of life in individuals with Rotator cuff syndrome. METHODS: This study was conducted on 30 patients with Rotator cuff syndrome. The patients were randomized into Mulligan and control group. All the patients participating in this study were treated with conventional physiotherapy. Additionally, the Mobilization with movement (MWM) technique was used in the Mulligan group. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), goniometer for the normal range of motion (ROM) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires were used for assessment. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvement was found in the post-treatment VAS, DASH, SF-36, and ROM values significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.05). However, the Mulligan group showed much better results when compared to the control group in ROM, VAS, DASH (p < 0.05). In the SF-36 questionnaire, significant results were obtained for both groups, except the social function parameter. For the SF-36 parameters, both groups performed equally. CONCLUSIONS: Mulligan mobilization was more effective than general treatment methods for pain as well as normal joint motion, DASH scoring and some parameters of SF-36 compared with general treatment methods.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIOS Pressen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRotator Cuff Syndromeen_US
dc.subjectMulligan Mobilizationen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.subjectQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.titleThe effect of Mulligan mobilization on pain and life quality of patients with Rotator cuff syndrome: A randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitationen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-9804-368Xen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-2476-6567en_US
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage171en_US
dc.identifier.endpage178en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BMR-181230en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record