Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEyüboğlu, Tan Fırat
dc.contributor.authorOlcay, Keziban
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Mutlu
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:49:34Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:49:34Z
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.citationEyüboğlu, T. F., Olcay, K. ve Özcan, M. (2019). Effects of chemical and physico-chemical surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of resin composite to different mineral trioxide aggregate based cements. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 33(16), 1836-1845. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1614733en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1614733
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/1650
dc.descriptionWOS: 000470637600001en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated the adhesion of resin composite to mineral trioxide aggregate based cements after different chemical and physico-chemical surface conditioning methods. Mineral trioxide aggregate based cements (Biodentine, ProRoot MTA, Imicryl MTA) were embedded in Teflon disks (N = 180). After storing at 37 degrees C at 100% humidity for 72 h, substrate surfaces were polished using silicon carbide papers. Specimens were allocated to 3 groups to be conditioned with one of the following (n = 15 per group): a) Adhesive resin (Clearfil SE Bond, CSE), b) Adhesive resin (Adper Single Bond 2, SB2), c) air-abrasion with 30 mu m alumina coated with silica + silane + adhesive resin (ALB), d) no surface conditioning, control group (CON). Microhybrid resin composite (Filtek Z250) was applied on the conditioned substrate surfaces and photo-polymerized. After storage at 37 degrees C at 100% humidity for 24 h, adhesive interfaces were loaded under shear (1 mm/min) in a universal testing machine. After debonding failure types were analyzed. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha = 0.05). SBS results were significantly affected by surface conditioning (p <0.05) and materials (p <0.05). Interaction terms were significant (p <0.05). Biodentine-ALB resulted in significantly higher SBS values (3.96 +/- 1.24) compared to those of other combinations, while ALB and SB2 resulted in no significant difference for ProRoot MTA and Imicryl MTA (p> .05). CSE (1.36 +/- 0.5- 1.98 +/- 0.76) did not significantly increase SBS for all MTA materials compared to the control group (0.8 +/- 0.52- 2 +/- 0.91) (p> 9.05). While CON groups resulted in exclusively adhesive failures, ALB presented the highest incidence of mixed failures for all materials tested (60-100%).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdhesionen_US
dc.subjectAir-Abrasionen_US
dc.subjectEtch and Rinse Adhesiveen_US
dc.subjectMineral Trioxide Aggregateen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Etch Adhesiveen_US
dc.subjectShear Bond Strengthen_US
dc.titleEffects of chemical and physico-chemical surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of resin composite to different mineral trioxide aggregate based cementsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Adhesion Science and Technologyen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-0308-9579en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-2168-710Xen_US
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.issue16en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1836en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1845en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2019.1614733en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record