Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorÜndar, Akif
dc.contributor.authorWang, Shigang
dc.contributor.authorPalanzo, David
dc.contributor.authorWise, Robert
dc.contributor.authorWoitas, Karl
dc.contributor.authorBaer, Larry
dc.contributor.authorKunselman, Allen
dc.contributor.authorSong, Jianxun
dc.contributor.authorAlkan Bozkaya, Tijen
dc.contributor.authorAkçevin, Atıf
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Shannon
dc.contributor.authorAğırbaşlı, Mehmet Ali
dc.contributor.authorClark, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorMyers, John
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:37:21Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:14
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:37:21Z
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.citationÜndar, A., Wang, S., Palanzo, D., Wise, R., Woitas, K., Baer, L. ... Myers, J. (2016). Impact of pulsatile flow on vital organ recovery during cardiopulmonary bypass in neonates and infants. Artificial Organs, 40(1), 14-18. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.12632en_US
dc.identifier.issn0160-564X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/1386
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.12632
dc.description.abstractDespite advances in surgical techniques and medical management, congenital heart defects still have a significant impact on morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Based on the Society of Thoracic Surgeon’s Fall 2014 database, neonates (0–30 days) have the highest congenital heart surgery mortality rate of 9.6% (9.1–10.1%), while infants (31 days to 1 year) 3.0% (2.8–3.2%) and children (>1 year–18 years) 1.1% (1.0–1.2%) follow over the last 4 years (1). Vital organ injury during and after neonatal and infant cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedures is considered to be a main cause (2–5). The reasons for this are multifactorial. Hundreds of articles have already been published on the major causes including systemic inflammatory response syndrome, deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, ischemia/reperfusion injury, hematocrit levels, degree of hypothermia, pH versus alpha stat strategies, and nonpulsatile versus pulsatile perfusion (6–8). Among them, perfusion mode is still a matter of controversy.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectImpact of Pulsatileen_US
dc.subjectFlow on Vital Organen_US
dc.subjectRecovery Duringen_US
dc.subjectCardiopulmonary Bypassen_US
dc.subjectNeonates and Infantsen_US
dc.titleImpact of pulsatile flow on vital organ recovery during cardiopulmonary bypass in neonates and infantsen_US
dc.typeeditorialen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArtificial Organsen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-0799-4875en_US
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage14en_US
dc.identifier.endpage18en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/aor.12632en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record