Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSert, Gürkan
dc.contributor.authorMega, Ertunç
dc.contributor.authorKaraca Dedeoğlu, Ayşegül
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-10T11:53:52Z
dc.date.available2023-01-10T11:53:52Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationSert, G., Mega, E. ve Karaca Dedeoğlu, A. (2022). Protecting privacy in mandatory reporting of infectious diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives from a developing country. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(12), 1015-1019. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107372en_US
dc.identifier.issn0306-6800
dc.identifier.issn1473-4257
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107372
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/10280
dc.description.abstractMandatory reporting of infectious diseases (MRID) is an essential practice to prevent disease outbreaks. Disease notification is a mandatory procedure for most infectious diseases, even during non-pandemic periods in healthcare. The main rationale behind MRID is the protection of public health. The information and data provided by infectious disease reports are used for many purposes, such as preventing the spread and potential negative impact of infectious diseases, assessing the national and global situation regarding reported diseases, conducting scientific research and planning health policy. In this context, the relevant information benefits public health, health systems and scientific work. Additionally, the follow up and treatment of individuals with infectious diseases is a necessity in certain cases to protect those who cohabit with them. However, these benefits cannot be accepted as unrestricted justifications for MRID, since it is evident that reporting should be conducted within ethical and legal boundaries. MRID should only be devised and implemented with due regard to balancing potential benefits between all individuals, as well as between the individual and the rest of society. Disease notification systems that are not designed with a balancing and harm-reductionist approach may lead to stigmatisation and discrimination. This study aims to investigate the legal framework and ethical issues regarding the reporting of individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 in Turkey-which is a primary example of a developing country.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectConfidentiality/Privacyen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectInformed Consenten_US
dc.subjectLawen_US
dc.subjectPublic Lawen_US
dc.titleProtecting privacy in mandatory reporting of infectious diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives from a developing countryen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Medical Ethicsen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sağlık Hukuku Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-9446-023Xen_US
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1015en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1019en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/medethics-2021-107372en_US
dc.institutionauthorMega, Ertunç
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.wos000722668800001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85126541623en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34610978en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster