Kızılırmak, FilizGünhan Demir, GültekinGökdeniz, TayyarGüneş, Hacı MuratÇakal, BeytullahGüler, EkremKaraca, İbrahim OğuzOmaygenç, Mehmet OnurYılmaz, FatihOlgun, Fatih ErkamKılıçaslan, Fethi10.07.20192019-07-1010.07.20192019-07-102016Kızılırmak, F., Günhan Demir, G., Gökdeniz, T., Güneş, H. M., Çakal, B., Güler, E. ... Kılıçaslan, F. (2016). Changes in electrocardiographic p wave parameters after cryoballoon ablation and their association with atrial fibrillation recurrence. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, 21(6), 580-587. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.123641082-720X1542-474Xhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/1441https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12364Background: Changes in P wave parameters after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) have been previously identified. In this study, we aimed to determine the changes in P wave parameters surface electrocardiogram (ECG) after cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) and evaluate their relationship with AF recurrence. Methods: Sixty-one patients (mean age 53 ± 11 years, 50.8% male) with paroxysmal AF who underwent CBA were enrolled. A surface ECG was obtained from all patients immediately before the procedure, and repeated 12 hours after the procedure. P wave amplitude (Pamp), P wave duration (Pwd), and P wave dispersion (Pdis) values in preprocedural and postprocedural ECGs were measured and compared. Recurrence rates of AF in 3, 6, and 9 months following ablation were recorded for all patients. Changes in P wave parameters were compared between patients with and without AF recurrence. Results: Compared to preprocedural measurements, Pamp (from 0.58 ± 0.18 mV at baseline to 0.48 ± 0.17 mV, P < 0.001), Pwd (from 109.72 ± 18.43 ms at baseline to 91.36 ± 22.53 ms, P < 0.001), and Pdis (from 55.44 ± 20.45 ms at baseline to 45.30 ± 15.31 ms, P < 0.001) were significantly decreased after CBA. The difference in Pamp between pre- and postprocedural values (?Pamp) was significantly higher in patients without AF recurrence compared to those with recurrence (0.10 ± 0.06 mV vs 0.04 ± 0.01 mV, P = 0.002). There was no difference in Pwd difference (?Pwd) and Pdis difference (?Pdis) between patients with and without AF recurrence (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Pamp, Pwd, and Pdis parameters exhibited significant decrease after CBA compared to preprocedural measurements. Decreased Pamp was shown to be a predictor for good clinical outcomes following CBA.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtrial ArrhythmiasAtrial FibrillationElectrocardiographyElectrophysiologyNoninvasive TechniquesArticle21658058710.1111/anec.12364Q4Q2