Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÖnügören, Nazik İrem
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorTatar, Numan
dc.contributor.authorEyüboğlu, Tan Fırat
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Mutlu
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-09T11:08:20Z
dc.date.available2024-01-09T11:08:20Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationÖnügören, N. İ., Demirci, F., Tatar, N., Eyüboğlu, T. F. ve Özcan, M. (2023). Adhesion of veneering composite to metal-free CAD/CAM materials: Effect of surface conditioning and adhesive resin type. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 37(24), 3582-3597. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2023.2214957en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2023.2214957
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/12113
dc.description.abstractObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the adhesion of veneering composite to metal-free computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials with different compositions after surface conditioning and application of adhesive resins.Materials and MethodsA total of one hundred and sixty specimens were divided into four groups (n = 40) manufactured either from polyetheretherketone (PEEK; KERAstar PEEK), polyetherketoneketone (PEKK; Pekkton), fiber-reinforced composite (FRC; Trinia), or high-impact polymer composite (COMP; Bredent HIPC) CAD/CAM discs. Each group was then randomly subdivided into four different subgroups of adhesive systems (n = 10) as Visiolink (Bredent), Single Bond Universal (3M), G-Premio BOND (GC), and OptiBond Universal (Kerr). The shear bond strength (SBS) of each specimen with veneering composite material was tested with a universal testing machine following thermocycle aging (5000 times). The modes of failure resulting from the tests were determined with scanning electron microscope (SEM), dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and analytical imaging. The data were statistically analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests (alpha = 0.05).ResultsThe highest SBS values among all groups were found for the COMP material (20.28 +/- 2.08 MPa) with OptiBond Universal adhesive, while the lowest for the PEEK material (10.33 +/- 2.47 MPa) with G-Premio BOND. The most common failure mode for the PEEK and PEKK specimens was adhesive failure, for the FRC and COMP groups mixed failures were common.ConclusionsBond strength values of at least 10 MPa were achieved for all tested between metal-free CAD/CAM materials and adhesive resin application.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInonu Universityen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdhesionen_US
dc.subjectCAD-CAMen_US
dc.subjectDental Materialsen_US
dc.subjectFiber Reinforced Compositeen_US
dc.subjectPEEKen_US
dc.subjectPolyetherether Ketoneen_US
dc.subjectProsthodonticsen_US
dc.subjectVeneering Compositeen_US
dc.titleAdhesion of veneering composite to metal-free CAD/CAM materials: Effect of surface conditioning and adhesive resin typeen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesion Science and Technologyen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-0308-9579en_US
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.issue24en_US
dc.identifier.startpage3582en_US
dc.identifier.endpage3597en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2023.2214957en_US
dc.institutionauthorEyüboğlu, Tan Fırat
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.wos000999585100001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85161408042en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster