Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorMangan, Mehmet Serhat
dc.contributor.authorGelegen, Erdem
dc.contributor.authorBaşerer, Tahire
dc.contributor.authorGazioǧlu, Nurperi
dc.contributor.authorAras, Cengiz
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-18T05:59:20Z
dc.date.available2021-06-18T05:59:20Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationMangan, M. S., Gelegen, E., Başerer, T., Gazioǧlu, N. ve Aras, C. (2021). Long term predictive ability of preoperative retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in visual prognosis after chiasmal decompression surgery. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 207. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106734en_US
dc.identifier.issn0303-8467
dc.identifier.issn1872-6968
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106734
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/7212
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate the relationship between preoperative retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and the recovery of visual field (VF) and visual acuity (VA) 1 year after surgery in chiasmal compression patients presenting with visual impairment. Patients and methods: Twenty-nine eyes of 16 patients with chiasmal compression and 14 eyes of 14 control subjects were enrolled. All patients undergoing chiasmal decompression surgery via a transsphenoidal approach were prospectively evaluated before and 1 year after surgery with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), mean deviation (MD) value with standard automated perimetry (SAP) and RNFL thickness with optical coherence tomography. Eyes with chiasmal compression were divided into two groups according to the mean preoperative RNFL thickness: ≥ 100 µm (Group 1) and < 100 µm (Group 2). The relationship between the mean preoperative RNFL thickness and visual prognosis parameters (VF, VA) was analyzed. Results: The mean preoperative RNFL thickness was 115.92 ± 8.97 µm, 84.0 ± 8.85 µm, and 114.21 ± 7.75 µm in Group 1 (n = 15 eyes), Group 2 (n = 14 eyes) and the control group (n = 14 eyes), respectively. The mean preoperative BCVA was 0.15 ± 0.3 in Group 1, and 0.41 ± 0.39 in Group 2. The mean BCVA increased to 0.03 ± 0.1 in Group 1 in the postoperative period but did not change in Group 2. MD value was − 6.10 ± 5.54 in the preoperative period and − 2.59 ± 2.23 in the postoperative period for Group 1 (p = 0.014), while it was − 18.97 ± 4.14 in the preoperative period and − 18.57 ± 4.51 in the postoperative period in Group 2 (p = 0.24). Conclusions: This study suggests that lower mean preoperative RNFL thickness was associated with poorer long-term visual prognosis. Preoperative RNFL thickness measurements may be helpful in predicting the recovery of VF and VA after decompression surgery in patients with chiasmal lesion presenting with visual impairment.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectChiasmal Compressionen_US
dc.subjectOptical Coherence Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectRetinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thicknessen_US
dc.subjectVisual Acuityen_US
dc.subjectVisual Fielden_US
dc.subjectVisual Recoveryen_US
dc.titleLong term predictive ability of preoperative retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in visual prognosis after chiasmal decompression surgeryen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Neurology and Neurosurgeryen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Göz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-8047-5553en_US
dc.identifier.volume207en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106734en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster