Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGündoğar, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorUslu, Gülşah
dc.contributor.authorÖzyürek, Taha
dc.contributor.authorPlotino, Gianluca
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T07:27:08Z
dc.date.available2021-04-05T07:27:08Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.citationGündoğar, M., Uslu, G., Özyürek, T. ve Plotino, G. (2020). Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of VDW.ROTATE, TruNatomy, 2Shape, and HyFlex CM nickel-titanium rotary files at body temperature. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e37en_US
dc.identifier.issn2234-7658
dc.identifier.issn2234-7666
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e37
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/6686
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aims to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of VDW.ROTATE, TruNatomy, 2Shape, and HyFlex CM nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files at body temperature.Materials and methods: In total, 80 VDW.ROTATE (25/0.04), TruNatomy (26/0.04), 2Shape (25/0.04), and HyFlex CM (25/0.04) NiTi rotary files (n = 20 in each group) were subjected to static cyclic fatigue testing at body temperature (37°C) in stainless-steel artificial canals prepared according to the size and taper of the instruments until fracture occurred. The number of cycles to fracture (NCF) was calculated, and the lengths of the fractured fragments were measured. The data were statistically analyzed using a 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tamhane tests at the 5% significance level (p < 0.05).Results: There were significant differences in the cyclic fatigue resistance among the groups (p < 0.05), with the highest to lowest NCF values of the files as follows: VDW.ROTATE, HyFlex CM, 2Shape, and TruNatomy. There was no significant difference in the lengths of the fractured fragments among the groups. The scanning electron microscope images of the files revealed typical characteristics of fracture due to cyclic fatigue.Conclusions: The VDW.ROTATE files had the highest cyclic fatigue resistance, and the TruNatomy and 2Shape files had the lowest cyclic fatigue resistance in artificial canals at body temperature.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKorean Academy of Conservative Dentistryen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectBody Temperatureen_US
dc.subjectCyclic Fatigueen_US
dc.subjectEndodonticsen_US
dc.subjectLiquid Ambienten_US
dc.subjectNiTi Instrumentsen_US
dc.titleComparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of VDW.ROTATE, TruNatomy, 2Shape, and HyFlex CM nickel-titanium rotary files at body temperatureen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRestorative Dentistry & Endodonticsen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-8656-7101en_US
dc.identifier.volume45en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5395/rde.2020.45.e37en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess