Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorArıcı, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorHamdard, Jamshid
dc.contributor.authorSakin, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorŞengiz Erhan, Selma
dc.contributor.authorAtçı, Muhammed Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorCekin, Ruhper
dc.contributor.authorSaka, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorKöse, Emin
dc.contributor.authorSaydam, Tuba
dc.contributor.authorGeredeli, Çağlayan
dc.contributor.authorCihan, Şener
dc.contributor.authorBilici, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-18T11:53:28Z
dc.date.available2021-03-18T11:53:28Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationArıcı, S., Hamdard, J., Sakin, A., Şengiz Erhan, S., Atçı, M. M., Cekin, R. ... Bilici, A. (2021). The conversion ofRASstatus in metastatic colorectal cancer patients after first-line biological agent treatment. Colorectal Disease, 23(1), 206-212. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/codi.15389en_US
dc.identifier.issn1462-8910
dc.identifier.issn1463-1318
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/codi.15389
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/6624
dc.description.abstractAim The aim was to investigate theRASdiscordance between initial and recurrent metastasectomy specimens in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) plus biological agents in a first-line setting. Methods Patients who had been treated with CT plus bevacizumab or cetuximab or panitumumab followed by R0 resection for potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases were scanned. Among these, patients who developed resectable new metastases after a disease-free interval longer than 6 months were included in the study. We compared theRASmutation status between the first biopsy and the second metastasectomy specimen. Results A total of 82 mCRC patients treated with CT plus biological agents in a first-line setting were included in the study. The first biopsy assessment showed wild-typeRAStumours in 39 (47.6%) patients and mutantRAStumours in 43 (52.4%) patients. The mean time for new operable liver metastasis after R0 resection was 15.5 months. In the second metastasectomy specimens, the numbers of wild-type and mutantRAStumours were 30 (36.6%) and 52 (63.4%), respectively. The comparison with the first biopsy specimens showedRASstatus conversions in 17 (20.7%) patients. Univariate comparison between patients with and withoutRASstatus conversion revealed that grade, pathological T stage, wild-typeRAStumour and longer biological agent use time in the first-line treatment were significant factors forRASconversion. Conclusion Our results suggest that re-biopsy is needed for an optimal second-line treatment decision in mCRC patients regardless of backbone biological agent, especially in patients with wild-typeRASmCRC.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInterdisciplinary Oncology Associationen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRAS Mutationsen_US
dc.subjectColorectal Canceren_US
dc.subjectBiological Agentsen_US
dc.titleThe conversion ofRASstatus in metastatic colorectal cancer patients after first-line biological agent treatmenten_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofColorectal Diseaseen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Tıbbi Patoloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, İç Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-6830-7701en_US
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage206en_US
dc.identifier.endpage212en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/codi.15389en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster